And perhaps even more amazingly, it does this while never straying far from Simba's (Donald Glover) journey of self-discovery and self-actualization, a harrowing tale that borrows heavily from Biblical stories, Greek tragedies and Shakespeare's Hamlet. What is the point of remaking a literal copy of the original if the filmmakers introduce nothing new to the story? The most obvious and instant response is certainly profit, and The Lion King decidedly accomplished that goal, becoming a global box-office phenomenon. (Take a gander at the Lady and the Tramp (2019)preview for Disney+ as further evidence of this.) And with that being said, the next issue that immediately comes to mind is questioning or deliberating on the purpose of these productions. Heck, even the phrase "live-action adaptation" doesn't really apply either seeing as how the movie is all CG-animated characters mixed into live footage of African backdrops.Įssentially, the studio, Favreau and his team have invented a new subgenre for Disney's latest craze of live-action remakes: the photorealistic replica. But since some of those moments are actually inspired by the Broadway musical, Favreau's movie can be best described as a facsimile, a duplicate or a carbon copy. Granted, there are a couple new sequences sprinkled here and there - the most apparent being the elephant graveyard sequence with the hyenas. In fact, given that almost every scene, from the camera angles and shots to the dialogue, is practically identical to its predecessor, we'd be hard-pressed to accurately call this a remake. Within a matter of a few minutes, it becomes abundantly clear The Lion King remake from director Jon Favreau ( The Jungle Book, Iron Man) is ultimately nothing more than a literal repeat of Walt Disney's 1994 original animated classic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |